|
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
Market ReformsAt IssueClick here to view NAHU's written statement by Janet Trautwein to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. (June 16, 2008) Click here to view the Senate Finance Committee’s web cast of Janet’s panel discussion “Insurance Market Reform.” Health Summit 2008 You must have RealPlayer to listen to this. www.real.comThe business of health insurance is primarily regulated at the state level of government. Currently, state health insurance markets are both extremely diverse and complex, with no two states sharing the exact same regulatory environment. Certainly, market reforms that work well in one state might not work as effectively in another. Furthermore, no one state has what could be termed the perfect health insurance climate. However, some health insurance market reforms have been adopted in the majority of states, such as small group rating bands, and are working in all of these states quite effectively. In addition, some state health insurance markets work much more efficiently than others. In general more carriers compete in these markets, costs are lower and there are fewer uninsured. Creating a more level playing field across the states in terms of health insurance regulation is a goal of many in order to decrease costs and improve market access and efficiency. NAHU's PositionNAHU believes that state health insurance markets need to be vibrant and competitive, allowing for a wide range of health insurance options for consumers. To achieve this goal, state markets need to:
NAHU also opposes proposals to create Association Health Plans (AHPs) that are exempt from health insurance benefit mandates and state rating laws. We are concerned that such AHPs would have a pricing advantage over the fully insured small group health insurance markets already operating in the states, thus creating an unlevel playing field. This pricing advantage could have a negative impact on reforms already passed at the state level and existing small employer markets. NAHU is also concerned about AHP proposals that would make coverage available to one-person groups on a guarantee-issue basis. Allowing business groups of one to purchase guarantee-issue group coverage has proven disastrous to small group markets in the states that have tried it, due to problems with both adverse selection and fraud. Allowing one-person groups to purchase AHP coverage will prove equally problematic, increasing the likelihood of plan failure and resulting in significant cost increases for all state small-group market participants. Congressional ActionNAHU is pleased that a federal health insurance market reform bill, S. 1955, the Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act of 2005, has been introduced.
Additional ResourcesNAHU's Position on Association Health Plans NAHU's Analysis of State Health Insurance Market ReformsThis document identifies some of the key elements of successful health insurance markets, explains why these reforms are important, and gives examples of why some state health insurance markets work and why others have failed.Massachusetts Health Care Reform - Governor Mitt Romney (R) of Massachusetts signed a bill that when implemented, will transform the health insurance market. It combines the individual and small group market and requires people to obtain health insurance coverage. NAHU's Comparison of Small-Group Market Health Insurance Rates in Select States, March 2006NAHU obtained true small-group market health insurance rates for a fictional small employer group in six separate states with different health insurance rating regulatory environments. This chart includes rates from two states(Georgia and Texas) with rating environments very similar to what is proposed in S. 1955, rates from two states where medical underwriting is currently not allowed and modified community rating is employed (Maryland and New Jersey), rates from a state where medical underwriting is allowed but tighter rating bands are used (California) and rates from a state with wider rating bands than what are proposed in S. 1955 (Ohio).NAHU's Analysis of State Individual and Small-Group Market Health Insurance Reforms, February 2006This chart outlines all of the current individual and small-group health insurance market reform measures currently place in each state.For more information, please contact Jessica Waltman.
|